Cervical Carcinoma and HPV: WHO 5th Edition HPV-Associated and HPV-Independent Tumours, Precursors, p16, Silva Patterns, Virtual Slides and MCQs

Gynaecological pathology ยท Cervix ยท WHO 5th ed

How the WHO 5th edition splits cervical squamous and glandular tumours by HPV status, the precursors of each, the p16 rules, Silva patterns, five whole slide images and MCQs.

PMPathology MCQ Editorial TeamUpdated Oct 202612 min read
Cervical carcinoma and HPV cover: schematic squamous epithelium with koilocytes and full-thickness atypia of HSIL with block p16 staining, Pathology MCQ.
At a glance
  • The big change: WHO 5th edition (2020) classifies cervical squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma as HPV-associated or HPV-independent
  • Squamous: over 95% of squamous cell carcinomas are HPV-associated; morphological subtypes do not predict HPV status
  • Glandular: usual-type adenocarcinoma is the commonest HPV-associated type; gastric-type is the commonest HPV-independent type
  • Surrogate test: diffuse block-type p16 marks high-risk HPV; HPV ISH or PCR confirms
  • Prognosis: HPV-independent tumours present later and behave worse

The WHO 5th edition approach

Persistent infection with high-risk HPV, above all types 16 and 18, causes most cervical cancers. The WHO Classification of Female Genital Tumours (5th edition, 2020) now puts HPV status first: each squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma is called HPV-associated or HPV-independent. The two groups differ in age, precursor lesion, behaviour and response to screening, and HPV vaccination will mostly prevent the first group.

Two pathways
HPV-associatedHPV-independent
Share of casesSquamous: over 95%. Adenocarcinoma: about 85โ€“90%Squamous: under 5%. Adenocarcinoma: about 10โ€“15%
Typical ageYounger, screening-detectedOlder, often advanced at diagnosis
p16Diffuse block-typeNegative or patchy
ScreeningDetected well by HPV testing and cytologyOften missed by HPV-based screening
PrognosisBetter, stage for stageWorse

Squamous precursors

The two-tier Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology (LAST), adopted by WHO, replaces CIN 1โ€“3 with LSIL and HSIL.

Koilocytes with perinuclear halos and enlarged, irregular nuclei in HPV-infected cervical squamous epithelium.Pathology MCQ
Koilocytes: perinuclear clearing and enlarged, wrinkled nuclei, the cytopathic effect of HPV.
LSIL and HSIL
LSIL (CIN 1)HSIL (CIN 2 and CIN 3)
MorphologyKoilocytes; atypia confined to the lower third, maturation preservedAtypical basaloid cells extend into the upper two-thirds or full thickness; mitoses above the basal layer
HPV typesLow-risk and high-riskHigh-risk, especially HPV 16 and 18
p16Negative or patchy (some block-positive)Diffuse block-type
Natural historyMost regressSignificant risk of progression; treated by excision
p16 rules (LAST and WHO)

Use p16 to separate HSIL from mimics such as atrophy, immature squamous metaplasia and reactive change, and to sort a CIN 2 morphology into HSIL (block-positive) or LSIL (negative). Do not use it on clear LSIL or clear HSIL.

Schematic of cervical squamous precursor lesions from LSIL to HSIL and invasive carcinoma.Pathology MCQ
Squamous progression from LSIL to HSIL and invasive carcinoma. Source: ResearchGate figure 234118462.

HPV-independent squamous precursors are well defined in the vulva, where differentiated VIN precedes HPV-independent carcinoma, but they are rare and poorly characterised in the cervix.

Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia with basal atypia and premature keratinisation, shown for comparison.Pathology MCQ
Differentiated VIN of the vulva, shown for comparison: the HPV-independent precursor is a vulvar lesion. Source: ResearchGate figure 233797083.

Squamous cell carcinoma

Invasive squamous cell carcinoma shows nests of atypical squamous cells with desmoplastic stroma, with or without keratin pearls and intercellular bridges.

Invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix with irregular nests of atypical squamous cells.Pathology MCQ
Invasive squamous cell carcinoma. Source: Acta Dermatovenerologica APA 11(3).
Pitfall

Keratinising, non-keratinising, basaloid, warty and papillary patterns do not tell you HPV status. Keratinising tumours can be HPV-associated, and basaloid and warty tumours usually are. WHO 5th edition asks for HPV status (p16 or HPV testing) rather than a morphological subtype.

Basaloid squamous cell carcinoma with solid nests of small basaloid cells.Pathology MCQ
Basaloid pattern: small basaloid cells in solid nests; usually HPV-associated in the cervix. Source: ResearchGate figure 313890319.

Glandular precursors and SMILE

Glandular precursors
LesionHPV statusKey features
Adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), usual typeHPV-associatedPseudostratified columnar cells with enlarged, hyperchromatic nuclei, apical mitoses and apoptotic bodies, in normally placed glands; p16 block-positive
Stratified mucin-producing intraepithelial lesion (SMILE)HPV-associatedStratified epithelium with mucin vacuoles through its full thickness; p16 block-positive; regarded as a variant of AIS and managed the same way
Gastric-type AISHPV-independentColumnar cells with abundant pale or eosinophilic cytoplasm and distinct borders, mild to moderate atypia; p16 negative or patchy, MUC6 positive
Key point

Atypical glandular cells (AGC) is a cytology reporting category, not a histological precursor. An AGC result calls for colposcopy, endocervical and, depending on age, endometrial sampling.

Comparison of SMILE with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, showing stratified cells with intracytoplasmic mucin.Pathology MCQ
SMILE compared with CIN: mucin vacuoles run through a stratified epithelium.
Histology panel of stratified mucin-producing intraepithelial lesion of the cervix.Pathology MCQ
SMILE. Source: Cells 2021;10(8):2039 (MDPI).

Adenocarcinoma

Cervical adenocarcinoma types (WHO 5th edition)
GroupTypesNotes
HPV-associatedUsual type (most common); mucinous NOS, intestinal, signet-ring cell; invasive stratified mucin-producing carcinoma (iSMC)Block p16; usual type has apical mitoses and apoptoses; villoglandular is a growth pattern of usual type
HPV-independentGastric type (most common in this group), clear cell, mesonephric, endometrioidp16 negative or patchy; gastric type is aggressive, MUC6 and HIK1083 positive, and linked to Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (STK11)
Clear cellHPV-independentHistorically linked to in-utero diethylstilboestrol; most current cases are sporadic; napsin A and HNF1ฮฒ positive
MesonephricHPV-independentArises from mesonephric remnants; GATA3 and luminal CD10 positive, ER and PR negative
Summary chart of cervical adenocarcinoma types.Pathology MCQ
Cervical adenocarcinoma types: summary chart.

Silva pattern classification

For HPV-associated adenocarcinoma, the pattern of invasion predicts nodal spread better than depth alone:

Silva patterns
PatternInvasionRisk
AWell-demarcated glands, no destructive stromal invasion or lymphovascular invasionNodal metastasis essentially absent; conservative surgery may be possible
BEarly destructive invasion from pattern A glands: small clusters or single cells, with or without lymphovascular invasionLow nodal risk, mainly with lymphovascular invasion
CDiffuse destructive invasion, confluent growth or solid areasHigher nodal and recurrence risk

Immunohistochemistry

Useful markers
MarkerUse
p16Block-type staining as a surrogate for high-risk HPV; distinguishes HPV-associated from HPV-independent tumours and HSIL from mimics
HPV ISH or PCRConfirms high-risk HPV when p16 is equivocal
ER and PRUsually negative or weak in endocervical adenocarcinoma; strong in endometrial endometrioid carcinoma
MUC6, HIK1083Gastric-type differentiation
GATA3, CD10Mesonephric carcinoma
Napsin A, HNF1ฮฒClear cell carcinoma
p53Often aberrant in HPV-independent tumours, especially gastric type
Exam focus

Endocervical versus endometrial origin: block p16 with ER and PR negative or weak favours an HPV-associated cervical primary; patchy p16, strong ER and PR, PTEN loss and nuclear ฮฒ-catenin favour endometrial endometrioid carcinoma.

Virtual slides

Follow the HPV-associated pathway from cytology to invasion. On annotated slides, tap a region and the viewer zooms to it.

Practice questions

Four quick questions on the points examiners test most.

PRACTICE ยท SBA1 of 4

How does the WHO 5th edition (2020) primarily classify cervical squamous cell carcinoma?

Show answer
Correct: C. HPV status is now the primary classifier, assessed by p16 immunohistochemistry or HPV testing. Morphological patterns do not reliably predict HPV status.
PRACTICE ยท SBA2 of 4

A cervical biopsy shows atypia extending to the middle third (CIN 2 morphology). Which result supports a diagnosis of HSIL?

Show answer
Correct: B. LAST recommends p16 for CIN 2 morphology: block-type staining upgrades it to HSIL; negative p16 favours LSIL or a mimic.
PRACTICE ยท SBA3 of 4

Which cervical adenocarcinoma is HPV-independent, aggressive and associated with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome?

Show answer
Correct: C. Gastric-type adenocarcinoma is the commonest HPV-independent type: MUC6 and HIK1083 positive, p16 negative or patchy, linked to STK11 and Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, with a poor prognosis.
PRACTICE ยท SBA4 of 4

An HPV-associated adenocarcinoma shows well-demarcated glands with no destructive stromal invasion and no lymphovascular invasion. What is its Silva pattern and nodal risk?

Show answer
Correct: A. Silva pattern A has no destructive invasion and essentially no nodal metastases, which can allow more conservative surgery.
Key takeaways
  • WHO 5th edition classifies cervical carcinomas by HPV status first.
  • Over 95% of squamous cell carcinomas are HPV-associated; morphological subtypes do not predict HPV status.
  • Use p16 for CIN 2 morphology and HSIL mimics, not for clear LSIL or HSIL.
  • SMILE is a variant of AIS; gastric-type is the main HPV-independent adenocarcinoma and behaves badly.
  • Silva pattern A adenocarcinoma has essentially no nodal spread.
References

WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Female Genital Tumours. WHO Classification of Tumours, 5th ed. Lyon: IARC; 2020 ยท Darragh TM, Colgan TJ, Cox JT, et al. The Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology Standardization Project for HPV-associated lesions. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2012;136:1266โ€“1297 ยท Stolnicu S, Barsan I, Hoang L, et al. International Endocervical Adenocarcinoma Criteria and Classification (IECC). Am J Surg Pathol 2018;42:214โ€“226 ยท Roma AA, Diaz De Vivar A, Park KJ, et al. Invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma: a new pattern-based classification system. Am J Surg Pathol 2015;39:667โ€“672

PM

Pathology MCQ Editorial TeamWritten and reviewed by practising pathologists who teach FRCPath, NEET-SS, INI-SS and MD/DNB candidates.

Practice bank

High-Yield, Board-Style Image MCQs & Interactive Whole Slide Images

High-resolution virtual microscopy with questions aligned to ABP, FRCPath, NEET-SS, DM Hematopathology and MD/DNB.


Discover more from PATHOLOGY MCQs

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

You cannot copy content of this page

Discover more from PATHOLOGY MCQs

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading