
Subtitle: Five ways to tell reactive gliosis from glioma: cellularity and spacing, nuclear features, margins, proliferation and IHC (IDH1 R132H, ATRX, p53), plus mimics such as tumefactive demyelination, with 10 MCQs.
Author: PathologyMCQ Editorial Board
Category: Neuropathology
Last Updated: October 2026
Read Time: 6 minutes
At-a-Glance
- Gliosis is a reactive process (infarct, demyelination, infection, around tumours); gliomas are neoplastic and often have gliosis at their edges.
- Spacing: gliosis is evenly spaced; glioma is irregular and crowded.
- Nuclei: gliosis nuclei are bland and do not touch; glioma nuclei are atypical, angulated and overlap.
- IHC: IDH1 R132H positivity, ATRX loss or strong p53 indicates glioma; never seen in gliosis.
- Ki-67 is low in gliosis, but also low in many low-grade gliomas.
Pathology MCQ app ยท Android
Get the Pathology MCQ app
Practise neuropathology with a new MCQ every day.
- โDaily MCQ with explanations and streaks
- ๐ฌVirtual slides you pinch-zoom, with annotations
- ๐Your courses, notes and mocks in one place
Comparison Table
| Feature | Reactive gliosis | Diffuse glioma |
|---|---|---|
| Cellularity | Mildly increased, even | Increased, uneven |
| Spacing | Evenly spaced astrocytes | Irregular clusters and crowding |
| Nuclei | Bland, round to oval, do not touch | Atypical, hyperchromatic, angulated, overlap |
| Processes | Long, symmetrical, radiating (stellate) | Short, irregular; naked nuclei |
| Secondary structures | Absent | Perineuronal satellitosis, subpial and perivascular clustering |
| Mitoses / Ki-67 | Rare; Ki-67 low | Variable; may be low in grade 2 |
| IDH1 R132H, ATRX, p53 | Negative / retained / weak | IDH1 R132H+, ATRX loss, p53 strong (astrocytoma) |
| Margins over time | Contracts | Expands |

1โ3. Cellularity, Nuclei and Margins
- Cellular density: even in gliosis, uneven in glioma.
- Nuclei: in gliosis they do not touch each other; in glioma they often overlap and are irregular.
- Margins: gliomas expand and infiltrate; gliosis contracts with time. Serial imaging helps.

4. Proliferation
Mitoses are rare in gliosis and the Ki-67 index is usually low. However, IDH-mutant grade 2 gliomas can also have a low Ki-67, so proliferation alone cannot exclude glioma.
5. Immunohistochemistry
- IDH1 R132H: positive tumour cells confirm an IDH-mutant glioma.
- ATRX: nuclear loss supports IDH-mutant astrocytoma (retained in gliosis).
- p53: strong diffuse staining in many astrocytomas; reactive cells show weak, patchy staining.
- H3 K27M (midline) and BRAF V600E can also confirm a neoplasm.
- GFAP is positive in both and does not help.
Mimics and Pitfalls
- Tumefactive demyelination: sheets of CD68+ macrophages, Creutzfeldt cells, myelin loss with axonal preservation.
- Piloid gliosis: Rosenthal fibres around craniopharyngioma, haemangioblastoma or syrinx can mimic pilocytic astrocytoma.
- Infarct and abscess margins: gemistocytes and reactive changes.
- Gliomatosis cerebri is no longer a separate entity: it is a growth pattern of diffuse glioma involving three or more lobes.
Video
Related: WHO CNS5 updates for gliomas โ
Test Yourself: 10 MCQs
Gliosis vs glioma: 10 MCQs
Morphology, IHC and mimics, with instant explanations.
More practice: the CNS tumours MCQ bank โ
Exam Pearls
- Even spacing and bland nuclei = gliosis; crowding, atypia and secondary structures = glioma.
- IDH1 R132H positive or ATRX lost = glioma.
- Creutzfeldt cells point to demyelination.
- Gliomatosis cerebri is a growth pattern, not an entity.
More courses
Preparing for an exam?
Related reads: WHO CNS5 updates โ ยท Lewy body vs Pick body โ
Pathology MCQ app ยท Android
Get the Pathology MCQ app
Practise a slide and an MCQ every day, even when you are away from your desk.
- โDaily MCQ with explanations and streaks
- ๐ฌVirtual slides you pinch-zoom, with annotations
- ๐Your courses, notes and mocks in one place
References
- WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Central Nervous System Tumours. 5th ed. IARC; 2021.
- Perry A, Brat DJ, eds. Practical Surgical Neuropathology: A Diagnostic Approach. 2nd ed. Elsevier; 2018.
Pathology MCQ


Leave a Reply